A U.S. appeals court panel in Washington Tuesday ruled 2-1 to uphold the core provision of President Obama\'s healthcare law. But U.S. Circuit Judge Laurence Silberman, who wrote for the majority, conceded the issue will \"almost surely be decided by the [U.S.] Supreme Court,\" where the justices are already considering it. \"The right to be free from federal regulation is not absolute,\" Silberman said in the opinion upholding the law, \"and yields to the imperative that Congress be free to forge national solutions to national problems, no matter how local -- or seemingly passive -- their individual origins.\" The challenge before the Washington court, one of several around the country, had been rejected by a federal judge before being appealed by a conservative group founded by Pat Robertson. The suit targeted the \"individual mandate,\" a provision of the law requiring all Americans who can afford it to buy some kind of health insurance or pay a penalty. The challengers\' \"central objection to the mandate is that Congress, for the first time, has actually commanded that all Americans purchase a product, health insurance, that many of them have never purchased before, never wish to purchase and may never need. ... The contested issue here is whether the government can require an immensely broad group of people -- all Americans, including uninsured persons with no involvement in the health insurance and healthcare markets -- to buy health insurance now, based on the mere likelihood that most will, at some point, need healthcare, thus virtually inevitably enter that market, and consequently substantially affect the health insurance market. [Challengers] say that Congress cannot regulate based on such sweeping generalizations.\" However, Silberman wrote, \"No Supreme Court case has ever held or implied that Congress\' commerce clause authority [to regulate interstate commerce] is limited to individuals who are presently engaging in an activity involving, or substantially affecting, interstate commerce.\" The Supreme Court is considering six healthcare petitions. A suit filed by 26 states and the National Federation of Independent Business is most likely to be considered by the court -- the Obama administration has pushed for its review and a determination on whether the individual mandate to buy health insurance is constitutional.
GMT 14:01 2018 Thursday ,30 August
Expat with rare heart disorder gets life-saving surgeryGMT 00:18 2018 Tuesday ,23 January
Boy with 10-pound tumour on face diesGMT 21:23 2018 Monday ,22 January
All set for first global medical tourism conference in DubaiGMT 22:46 2018 Sunday ,21 January
Second face transplant for FrenchmanGMT 07:51 2018 Saturday ,20 January
Trio aquitted of negligence in Canada railway disasterGMT 10:57 2018 Thursday ,18 January
Breastfeeding for 6 months cuts diabetes risk in half: studyGMT 16:10 2018 Wednesday ,17 January
Child mummy in Italy had hepatitis, not smallpoxGMT 18:36 2018 Tuesday ,16 January
Greece strikes cause transport chaos, healthcare delays

Maintained and developed by Arabs Today Group SAL.
All rights reserved to Arab Today Media Group 2025 ©
Maintained and developed by Arabs Today Group SAL.
All rights reserved to Arab Today Media Group 2025 ©
Send your comments
Your comment as a visitor