Iran calls on world powers to take serious confidence-building measures

Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Marziyeh Afkham reminded the world powers of the tall wall of mistrust between the two sides, and said the western members of the Group 5+1 (the US, Russia, China, France and Britain plus Germany) should adopt serious measures to build Tehran’s confidence. “There is a wall of mistrust" and one can be optimistic to say that the West would grab the opportunity and would "not allow this distrust to grow”, Afkham told reporters in Tehran on Tuesday. Stressing that the western states are facing a momentous test of honesty, she said, “We believe that the West should take serious steps to build the Iranian nation’s confidence.” In their late November talks in Geneva, Iran and the world powers reached a final deal after days of hard work and intensive negotiations. A few hours after Tehran and the sextet endorsed the deal in Geneva on November 24, the White House released a modified version of the deal, which angered Tehran and made the Iranian Foreign Ministry release the real text of the agreement. Afkham once again noted the White House wrong move, and said those interested can visit the website of the EU foreign policy to see the real text of the agreement, called 'Joint Plan of Action'. The deal includes removal of a part of the US-led West's sanctions Iran's crude supplies, petrochemical exports and part of the banking operations, including the pay-back of Iran's crude export revenues. According to the deal, no further sanctions will be imposed against Iran. Iran’s crude sales will be maintained at the current level and Iran’s oil revenues will also be released. Sanctions on Iran’s petrochemical sector will be completely removed and the sanctions on the country’s auto industry will also be lifted. Sanctions on imports and exports of gold and precious metals, as well as the ban on the insurance of transportation and shipping services will be fully lifted as well. Breaching the Geneva deal, the European Union on Friday announced that it has placed 17 Iranian companies under sanctions again after the European Court of Justice in mid September ruled against the bans imposed by the West on the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL) and 17 other Iranian companies. After the EU’s measure, Afkham lashed out at the European Union for reinforcing sanctions on a number of Iranian companies, and urged the EU to step in line with the recent Geneva agreement between Iran and the six world powers and take confidence-building measures. “Taking into account the Geneva agreement and the joint efforts being made to take the initial steps towards implementing it, this action (by the EU) raises question and causes surprise,” Afkham said Sunday. She called the EU sanction on Iranian firms as a "unilateral and politicized move lacking the necessary legal basis". “While firmly rejecting this move, we recommend the European Union to come in line with the orientation of the Geneva agreement and move towards reinforcement of mutual trust,” the Iranian foreign ministry spokeswoman said. On Friday, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister and senior negotiator in the talks with the major world powers Seyed Abbas Araqchi also condemned the sanctions, and said that the new EU sanctions are not only against the Geneva understanding, but also against the spirit of cooperation. On September 16, the European Court of Justice ruled against the bans imposed by the West on the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL) and 17 other Iranian companies, ordering the 27-nation bloc to strike them off its list of embargoed entities. IRISL Managing-Director Mohammad Hossein Dajmar made the announcement, and said, “This big success shows the IRISL’s righteousness and also and the baselessness of the accusations leveled against it.” “After the European Union imposed its unilateral sanctions, the IRISL put revocation of the EU's illegal decisions on its agenda and eventually after months of efforts, follow-ups and holding meetings, the European Court of Justice in a verdict issued this morning (Monday, September 16) ordered revocation of the EU’s sanctions,” Dajmar said. In June 2011, the EU targeted over 30 IRISL holding companies as part of a wider sanctions campaign led by the Western states aimed mostly at forcing Tehran to curb its nuclear energy drive. In September, the European Union's top court thrown out the sanctions imposed against eight Iranian banks and companies for their alleged ties to Iran’s nuclear energy program. The European Court of Justice in Luxembourg ruled that there was not sufficient evidence to justify the unilateral sanctions imposed by the bloc on the Iranian entities. Late in January, Managing-Director of Bank Mellat (the largest private bank in Iran) Ali Divandari announced that his bank has been removed from the EU's sanctions list. "After two and a half years of intensive legal work to remove the sanctions, the court declared a ruling in support of Bank Mellat," Divandari said. In August 2012, the Council of the EU reversed its decision for imposing sanctions against Divandari after the latter party filed a complaint at international bodies and sued the EU over its illegal action. A London-based Indian solicitor firm Zaiwalla & Co solicitor represented Divandari's case in the European Court of Justice to challenge the legality of the sanctions. Bank Mellat was fighting US accusations of involvement in confidential financial activities to help fund Iran's nuclear activities. The EU Council had listed Dr. Divandari in the designated list in July 2010 on the basis that it was a legitimate part of its regime of sanctions designed to stop Iranian nuclear program. He was at the time Chairman of Bank Mellat. The Council had designated the Bank Mellat and it considered it to be involved in Iran's attempts to develop a nuclear program and then went a step further, said Zaiwalla, by deciding to personally designate the Bank's chairperson too on the basis of his job title. Both the bank and Dr. Divandari challenged the sanctions in the European Courts. After a long process, both were finally given a hearing before the General Court of the European Union in May 2012. Both parties presented their cases and argued that it was not lawful to impose sanctions against private sector institutions or their employees. Iran's private sector has no role to play in the acts of the Iranian state, they argued.