Five questions for FIFA President Joseph S. Blatter

Mr Blatter, are you P1? Yes, that is me. Why all this anonymity? That means the speculation will never stop... It was the Swiss Federal Court that decided to make the publication of the ISL non-prosecution order anonymous. As far as I am concerned, the whole document could have been published \'clean\', to put an end to the speculation once and for all. However, the Federal Court stated that the “names of all non-accused third parties” should be made anonymous. I am not accused, so I have been made anonymous as P1, which quite honestly is not difficult to find out. You’re supposed to have known. Known what? That commission was paid? Back then, such payments could even be deducted from tax as a business expense. Today, that would be punishable under law. You can’t judge the past on the basis of today’s standards. Otherwise it would end up with moral justice. I can’t have known about an offence that wasn’t even one. The case has been closed from a legal point of view. But isn’t there still an ethical question to be answered? Of course. That is why we have started to strengthen our control mechanisms: to prevent something like this happening in the future. The Ethics Committee, which was created in 2006 on my initiative, is a direct result of the ISL case. The reform process is moving exactly in this direction. To strengthen FIFA’s judicial system, some important steps have already been taken with the introduction of a two-chamber system – an adjudicatory body and an investigatory body. The Executive Committee will appoint the chairmen of these two chambers next week. Ricardo Teixeira and Joao Havelange are named in the ISL non-prosecution order. Teixeira has resigned from the Executive Committee, but Havelange is still Honorary President. Will you call him to account? I don’t have the power to call him to account. The Congress named him as Honorary President. Only the Congress can decide his future.