after mosul certainties and uncertainties
Last Updated : GMT 05:17:37
Emiratesvoice, emirates voice
Emiratesvoice, emirates voice
Last Updated : GMT 05:17:37
Emiratesvoice, emirates voice

After Mosul: Certainties and uncertainties

Emiratesvoice, emirates voice

after mosul certainties and uncertainties

Amir Taheri

As the battle for Mosul enters what looks like its decisive phase, Iraqi leaders face a number of certainties and uncertainties.

The first certainty is that, in pure military terms, Daesh cannot maintain its hold on the western section of Mosul for much longer.

The next certainty is that, when staring at impending defeat, the hard-core Daesh fighters will retreat to Syria where they could retrench and remain in their deadly business for months, not years.

From its very beginning, Daesh has had an implicit non-aggression pact with the Syrian regime and its Iranian backers. In an interview granted to French television earlier this month, the head of the regime, Bashar Assad, tried to avoid the thorny issue by beating around the bush. He claimed that his aim was to “liberate every inch of Syrian territory” with priority given to recapturing areas not controlled by Daesh.

The next certainty is that the US under a new administration is determined to help destroy Daesh. This is an important development, ending the shadow-boxing put on show by President Barack Obama. The visit to Iraq last week by the new US Secretary of Defense, Gen. James Mattis, was designed to signal a major change in American strategy.

Under Obama the US was more than parsimonious in investing in the fight against Daesh. Obama wanted to appear to be fighting “the enemy of mankind” with a minimum of commitment on his part. Even the use of American air power in ongoing battles had to be cleared with him, a process that often took too long to be of any use to the Iraqi ground forces engaged in the fighting.

Daesh could also count on another certainty: A Turkish version of benign neglect with Ankara preferring to fight the Kurds in Syria rather than Sunni Arab militants.

In recent months the non-aggression arrangement between Daesh on the one hand, and Assad and his Iranian sponsors on the other, has been extended to cover Russia as well. The Russia-Iran-Assad triumvirate is likely to remain focused on fighting non-Daesh anti-regime groups, allowing Daesh to maintain a presence in Syria.

Even when it is driven out of Mosul, the Daesh terror machine is likely to remain a neighbor of Iraq just across the border in Syria. It could morph into a foyer of provocation and terror that Iraqi leaders would ignore at their peril.

As things stand today, winning a military victory in Mosul — in the sense of hoisting the Iraqi national flag in place of the black banner of Daesh in the city — may be the easiest part of a complex and dangerous game.

Beyond that there are a number of uncertainties that could transform any victory into a temporary triumph if not a pyrrhic exercise.

The first uncertainty regards the way that the spoils of victory might be shared.

The various Shiite armed groups that have taken part in parts of the battle are determined to claim as big a share as they can. If they bite a bigger morsel than they deserve, they could transform the end of the war into a recipe for revanchism by the humiliated Sunni population.

That sentiment could be deepened if Tehran tries to grab a bigger share beyond the usual Madison Avenue “selfies” of Qassem Soleimani.

Then we have the Kurds, again divided into different groups with contradictory agendas none of which includes the concept of Iraqi nationhood.

Finally, various Iraqi official forces, starting with the so-called Golden Division, are also in the picture anxious to heighten their profiles in the hope of playing a greater role in any putative political configuration in Baghdad.

The next uncertainty is: In whose name will victory in Mosul be claimed?

Winning the war against Daesh in the name of Iraq as a united nation-state is one thing, winning it in the name of a coalition of disparate — at times even antagonistic, ethnic and sectarian forces — is quite another.

It may not be exaggerated to suggest that the right victory in Mosul could mark the rebirth of Iraq as a nation-state while the wrong victory could spell the end of Iraq as a unified entity. Recent leaks in Washington reveal that the Obama administration was in fact counting on a wrong victory leading to the break-up of Iraq into three mini-states, a scheme propagated by Vice President Joe Biden since the 1990s.

The most important uncertainty, even assuming the Iraqi leaders manage the risks entailed in sharing the spoils of victory, concerns what may happen after Mosul.

The standard narrative in Baghdad, echoed across the world, is that Daesh consists of a few thousand “foreign,” that is to say non-Iraqi, fanatics who have gathered from all over the world to oppress the people of Mosul. (Bashar Assad makes a similar claim about all his opponents in Syria.)

Reality, however, is more complex than that.

There are, of course, many thousands of evil-doers who have come to Iraq and Syria to realize their criminal schemes in the name of Islam. However, it would be naive to think that they and they alone are involved in what is a major struggle over the future shape of Iraq and Syria if not the entire Middle East. The truth is that a good segment of the population in Mosul so resented the government in Baghdad that it was prepared to tolerate, if not actually help, Daesh as a lesser of the two evils.

That segment of population, which includes the remnants of the Baathist regime, the army of Saddam Hussein and his civil and security services, represents the marshlands in which the mosquitoes of terror have been breeding and could continue to breed in the future.

Any “after Mosul” strategy should include a realistic plan to smoke out and expel the non-Iraqi terrorists, many of them citizens of Western European nations and Russia, who have joined Daesh.

But it must also include plans to weave Iraq’s Sunni community back into the fabric of national politics by granting them a genuine share of power and a clear vision for a future in dignity. And that, of course, cannot be done if the central power in Baghdad is atrophied by corruption, sectarianism and incompetence.

The new US administration must make its support for the war to liberate Mosul conditional on a genuine attempt at house-cleaning in Baghdad.

GMT 17:34 2018 Thursday ,30 August

Can people be religious without being rigid?

GMT 17:17 2018 Thursday ,30 August

Turkey-US differences should not be allowed

GMT 15:35 2018 Wednesday ,29 August

Could EU recession lead to more protectionism?

GMT 15:24 2018 Wednesday ,29 August

We must remember the two sides of John McCain

GMT 15:14 2018 Wednesday ,29 August

The Putin Method: All Nice And Legal

GMT 14:47 2018 Wednesday ,29 August

The clear choices facing Iran

GMT 14:18 2018 Wednesday ,29 August

The Helsinki irony: When Trump and Assad both win

GMT 14:10 2018 Wednesday ,29 August

Between forming a cabinet and collapse in Lebanon

Name *

E-mail *

Comment Title*

Comment *

: Characters Left

Mandatory *

Terms of use

Publishing Terms: Not to offend the author, or to persons or sanctities or attacking religions or divine self. And stay away from sectarian and racial incitement and insults.

I agree with the Terms of Use

Security Code*

after mosul certainties and uncertainties after mosul certainties and uncertainties

 



GMT 09:19 2017 Thursday ,09 March

ECB set to hold course in face of mounting pressure

GMT 17:45 2016 Monday ,18 April

School Olympics embody state's future vision

GMT 13:41 2017 Wednesday ,22 November

VIRGO (August24th-September23rd)

GMT 04:22 2013 Tuesday ,29 October

Universal TV journalist dies of injuries in Somalia

GMT 10:09 2016 Tuesday ,21 June

Kuwait amends sports laws; bans might stay

GMT 02:30 2017 Thursday ,12 October

Saudi-bound PIA flight makes 'technical landing

GMT 17:00 2018 Monday ,22 January

Tourism expected to take a big leap in Malaysia

GMT 10:55 2018 Monday ,22 January

Bahrain-Indian economic ties discussed

GMT 10:28 2018 Monday ,22 January

Kindergarten Sports Day at ILOA

GMT 07:06 2018 Friday ,19 January

China economy rebounds in 2017 with 6.9% growth

GMT 07:23 2018 Thursday ,18 January

Philippine volcano 'fireworks' draw

GMT 07:28 2015 Saturday ,04 April

Djokovic, Murray set to clash in Miami final

GMT 13:04 2018 Thursday ,04 January

South African train crash toll rises to 12

GMT 11:33 2017 Sunday ,26 November

PISCES (February20th-March20th)

GMT 07:48 2015 Tuesday ,25 August

Sketch & FOUR London to launch pop-up salon

GMT 11:05 2011 Saturday ,17 December

Qalqiliya teacher unpaid for \'political reasons\'

GMT 13:09 2017 Thursday ,09 March

For US composer, understanding Trump through optics

GMT 12:35 2017 Thursday ,09 February

Is Lebanon’s crisis due to elections or to the regime

GMT 09:53 2017 Wednesday ,15 November

Saad refuses to comment on rival’s video

GMT 10:25 2017 Thursday ,23 November

PISCES (February20th-March20th)

GMT 08:14 2016 Monday ,22 August

Israel hits Hamas targets in Gaza

GMT 00:55 2017 Sunday ,11 June

Qatari media steps up its malicious

GMT 09:07 2017 Sunday ,10 December

H.E.R.,Teyana Taylor and everything else
Emiratesvoice, emirates voice
 
 Emirates Voice Facebook,emirates voice facebook  Emirates Voice Twitter,emirates voice twitter Emirates Voice Rss,emirates voice rss  Emirates Voice Youtube,emirates voice youtube  Emirates Voice Youtube,emirates voice youtube

Maintained and developed by Arabs Today Group SAL.
All rights reserved to Arab Today Media Group 2021 ©

Maintained and developed by Arabs Today Group SAL.
All rights reserved to Arab Today Media Group 2021 ©

emiratesvoieen emiratesvoiceen emiratesvoiceen emiratesvoiceen
emiratesvoice emiratesvoice emiratesvoice
emiratesvoice
بناية النخيل - رأس النبع _ خلف السفارة الفرنسية _بيروت - لبنان
emiratesvoice, Emiratesvoice, Emiratesvoice