Laundered Russian cash ‘went through big banks’

Cash that flowed from Russia through a vast money-laundering network sometimes ended up passing through the world’s largest banks, with UK firms including HSBC Holdings Plc handling almost $740 million (Dh2.72 billion), the Guardian reported, citing a cache of financial records it reviewed.

The documents contain details of about 70,000 banking transactions, including 1,920 involving firms based in the UK and 373 in the US, the newspaper said. The records indicate at least $20 billion moved out of Russia between 2010 and 2014, and that some of it ended up at overseas banks. The flows are tied to a network dubbed the Global Laundromat, the subject of a 2014 report by the Organised Crime & Corruption Reporting Project, an investigative journalism group that provided some of the documents, the paper said.

HSBC handled $545 million of Laundromat cash, mostly routed through its Hong Kong branch, the Guardian said, without elaborating on the dealings. Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc, majority owned by the UK government, processed $113 million, the paper said. Standard Chartered Plc, UBS Group AG, Citigroup Inc, Bank of America Corp, Barclays Plc and ING Groep NV handled amounts ranging from $2 million to $37 million, it said.

All of the banks named in the story said they have strict money-laundering controls, though none challenged the data’s authenticity, according to the Guardian. The owners of offshore entities that moved money through the banks often kept their identities secret, the report noted.

While companies that shield owners’ identities can be used legally, they can also be tools for laundering money, hiding assets or evading taxes. The US, among other countries, require banks doing business within their borders to perform due diligence on their clients to understand who the beneficial owners of such structures may be. Banks are supposed to confidentially alert authorities to transactions that may warrant further investigation.

“This case highlights the need for greater information sharing between the public and private sectors, each of whom holds important information the other does not,” HSBC told the newspaper.

In a statement, RBS said it’s “committed to combating financial crime and money laundering in line with our regulations.” The firm said it has systems in place to monitor transactions, flagging those that may be suspicious.

Standard Chartered said it’s committed to preventing fraud, money laundering and terrorist financing. “We will investigate any indications of suspicious activity and if appropriate report those findings to law enforcement,” it said in a statement.

And Citigroup said it continually take steps to improve its systems for detecting money laundering or other illicit transactions “to anticipate and respond to the changing patterns of criminal and terrorist behaviour.”

Spokesmen for the other banks declined to comment or didn’t immediately respond to messages from Bloomberg seeking comment.

Sham loans

To move money out of Russia, two entities typically pretended to lend money to each other, underwritten by Russian businesses, according to the Guardian. One company would then “default,” allowing the Russian businesses to send cash to an account in Moldova. The money then went to Latvia, inside the European Union.

Authorities in Russia, Moldova and Latvia have said they’re cracking down on money laundering following the journalism group’s 2014 report on the alleged Laundromat. The head of Russia’s central bank, Elvira Nabiullina, has led a purge of banks that closed almost 100 of them last year. Many were undercapitalised or suspected of violating money-laundering laws, authorities have said.

UK banks seen facing losses from Scottish independence

London: UK banks could face as much as £3 billion ($3.7 billion; Dh13.64 billion) of credit losses if Scotland became independent, causing an economic downturn, analysts at JPMorgan Chase & Co led by Raul Sinha wrote in a note to clients. CYBG Plc, the operator of the Clydesdale and Yorkshire banks, is most at risk due to a high concentration of Scottish loans, while larger firms such as Lloyds Banking Group Plc would face restructuring costs. Circumstances have changed since the last vote in 2014, and a break-up of Britain is now “an impossible-to-ignore potential outcome,” the analysts wrote

source : gulfnews